✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Muhammad Ali Jinnah presented the Two Nation Theory, the claim that Hindus and Muslims of British India constitute separate nations, in his presidential address at the Muslim League's Lahore session in March 1940.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that Muhammad Ali Jinnah presented the Two Nation Theory, the claim that Hindus and Muslims of British India constitute separate nations, in his presidential address at the Muslim League's Lahore session in March 1940?
Yes. A Wikipedia reference states that in Jinnah's All India Muslim League presidential address at Lahore on March 22, 1940, he argued Hindus and Muslims could never form a common nationality, which directly supports the claim. Other sources confirm the League's 1940 Lahore Resolution and Jinnah's Muslim-nationalist stance but do not tie the Two Nation Theory's presentation to that specific address.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
Evidence for · 4
Get citation
Two-nation theory - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-nation_theory
See more details
More for · 3
Get citation
Road To Partition. (n.d.). archive.org. https://archive.org/details/road-to-partition
Get citation
The Partition of British India, the rupture that created Pakistan. (2023). dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr. https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-04721767v1
Get citation
南アジア現代史における「ナショナリスト・ムスリム」と「ムスリム・ナショナリスト」の確執 : アキール文庫所蔵資料を手掛かりに. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.14989/210341
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work