trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Earthquakes are more frequent now than in the past.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that earthquakes are more frequent now than in the past?

Partly. Some sources assert that earthquakes have become more frequent worldwide in recent years, while older references caution that apparent increases reflect better recording or suggest past quakes were more frequent. None provides a rigorous past-versus-present comparison, so the evidence only partially addresses the claim.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 3 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Effects of acupuncture on earthquake survivors with major psychiatric disorders and related symptoms: A scoping review of clinical studies. (n.d.). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286671

Evidence against · 2
Get citation
The Wonder Book of Volcanoes and Earthquakes. (n.d.). gutenberg.org. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/43320

See more details
More for · 2
Get citation
On Time Scales and Causes of Abrupt Paleoclimatic Events. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(79)90094-2

2015
Get citation
Effect Of Co2 Sequestration On Soil Liquefaction In Geological Pits. (2015). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1472103

More against · 1
Get citation
The Romance of Modern Geology. (n.d.). gutenberg.org. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/65307

Receipt History
held for human review17 Oct 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work