✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Public transport is worse for the environment than private car travel per passenger kilometer.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against
Is it true that public transport is worse for the environment than private car travel per passenger kilometer?
No. Multiple sources report that public transport is generally more energy-efficient and lower-carbon than private car travel per passenger kilometer, with London trains about five times better than a personal car. One source notes buses can be less efficient, but the overall evidence contradicts the claim.
Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked
Evidence against · 4
Get citation
Public transport. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_transport
See more details
More against · 3
Get citation
Is public transport less fuel-efficient than cars?. (2011). skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/4740/is-public-transport-less-fuel-efficient-than-cars
Get citation
Yinan, T. (2015). How New Yorkers Prefer to Take Public Transport? A Comprehensive Analysis Based on 2010-2011 Regional Household Travel Survey. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8ZG6RFR
Get citation
Which form of transport has the smallest carbon footprint? | Our World in Data. (n.d.). ourworldindata.org. https://ourworldindata.org/travel-carbon-footprint
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work