trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Owning more shares of a company's common stock gives a shareholder proportionally more votes.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Owning more shares of a company's common stock gives a shareholder proportionally more votes?

Unclear. Two reference items touch on shareholder voting: one links larger shareholdings to greater proportionate ownership and mentions votes, and another distinguishes voting from nonvoting share classes. Neither states that owning more common shares gives proportionally more votes, so the evidence only partially covers the claim.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
David Scott's Guide to Investing in Common Stocks
2005
Get citation
Scott, D. L. (2005). David Scott's Guide to Investing in Common Stocks. books.google.com. http://books.google.com/books?id=0Wzy9dqfvYYC&dq=Owning+more+shares+of+a+company%27s+common+stock+gives+a+shareholder+proportionally+more+votes.&hl=&as_pt=BOOKS&source=gbs_api

See more details
More for · 1
The Investment Advisor Body of Knowledge + Test Bank
2015
Get citation
IMCA (2015). The Investment Advisor Body of Knowledge + Test Bank. play.google.com. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=XY9xBgAAQBAJ&source=gbs_api

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work