trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Chain-of-thought prompting improves reasoning in large language models.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
8 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Chain-of-thought prompting improves reasoning in large language models?

Yes. The Wei et al. chain-of-thought paper reports that CoT prompting improves performance on arithmetic, commonsense and symbolic reasoning tasks across three large language models. Several narrower studies in legal reasoning, program repair, depression detection and bias evaluation also report CoT improving task performance in their specific domains.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 8 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 8
Get citation
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting. (n.d.). openreview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=NoD9czmRH6

See more details
More for · 7
Get citation
[2201.11903] Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. (n.d.). arxiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903

Get citation
Evaluating Gender Bias in Large Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2401.15585

Get citation
Enhancing Depression Detection with Chain-of-Thought Prompting: From Emotion to Reasoning Using Large Language Models. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc58623.2025.11253093

Get citation
Pyramid of Thought: A Novel Approach for Enhancing Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.11517/pjsai.jsai2024.0_3xin2111

2025
Get citation
Nurtantyana, E. D. R. A. G. R. (2025). A comparative study of large language models with chain-of thought prompting for automated program repair. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/10.11591ijai.v14.i6.pp4579-4589

2026
Get citation
Han, J., Jo, H., Hong, J., & Lee, S. (2026). Negative Contrastive Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Transfer Reasoning Capability to Small Language Models. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3713532

Get citation
Structured Evaluation of Legal Reasoning in LLMs: Chain-of-Thought Prompting and Human Scoring for Retrieval Robustness. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.20736/0002002106

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work