✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Chain-of-thought prompting improves reasoning in large language models.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
8 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that Chain-of-thought prompting improves reasoning in large language models?
Yes. The Wei et al. chain-of-thought paper reports that CoT prompting improves performance on arithmetic, commonsense and symbolic reasoning tasks across three large language models. Several narrower studies in legal reasoning, program repair, depression detection and bias evaluation also report CoT improving task performance in their specific domains.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 8 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
Evidence for · 8
Get citation
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting. (n.d.). openreview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=NoD9czmRH6
See more details
More for · 7
Get citation
[2201.11903] Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. (n.d.). arxiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903
Get citation
Evaluating Gender Bias in Large Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2401.15585
Get citation
Enhancing Depression Detection with Chain-of-Thought Prompting: From Emotion to Reasoning Using Large Language Models. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc58623.2025.11253093
Get citation
Pyramid of Thought: A Novel Approach for Enhancing Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.11517/pjsai.jsai2024.0_3xin2111
Get citation
Nurtantyana, E. D. R. A. G. R. (2025). A comparative study of large language models with chain-of thought prompting for automated program repair. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/10.11591ijai.v14.i6.pp4579-4589
Get citation
Han, J., Jo, H., Hong, J., & Lee, S. (2026). Negative Contrastive Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Transfer Reasoning Capability to Small Language Models. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3713532
Get citation
Structured Evaluation of Legal Reasoning in LLMs: Chain-of-Thought Prompting and Human Scoring for Retrieval Robustness. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.20736/0002002106
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work