trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

All genes code for proteins.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that all genes code for proteins?

No. Multiple reference sources state explicitly that not all genes code for proteins, noting that some genes are non-coding or regulator genes. A chloroplast genome study also shows genes coding for tRNA and rRNA rather than proteins.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 4
Does a gene code for protein molecules or a DNA codes for protein molecules?
2017
Get citation
Does a gene code for protein molecules or a DNA codes for protein molecules?. (2017). biology.stackexchange.com. https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/55005/does-a-gene-code-for-protein-molecules-or-a-dna-codes-for-protein-molecules

See more details
More against · 3
Encyclopedia of life sciences
1996
Get citation
Encyclopedia of life sciences. (1996). archive.org. https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofli0004unse

AQA A2 biology
2009
Get citation
Steve, P. (2009). AQA A2 biology. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/aqaa2biology0000pott

GENE CONTENT IN SOLANACEOUS CHLOROPLAST GENOMES
2020
Get citation
GENE CONTENT IN SOLANACEOUS CHLOROPLAST GENOMES. (2020). hal.science. https://hal.science/hal-05286223v1

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work