trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Land value increases with population growth.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that land value increases with population growth?

Partly. Several sources state that land values tend to rise with population growth, though usually as one factor among several rather than a general law. One older source disputes that land prices rise in exact proportion to population, so the evidence supports only a partial, qualified version of the claim.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 3 sources for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
2013
Get citation
Land value capture in policy and practice. (2013). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.63642/1357-1419.1157

Evidence against · 1
Get citation
Practical Politics; or, the Liberalism of To-day. (n.d.). gutenberg.org. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/35894

See more details
More for · 2
2024
Get citation
A Bibliometric Analysis of Land Value Capture Research. (2024). avesis.yildiz.edu.tr. https://avesis.yildiz.edu.tr/publication/details/d014c10d-6e4c-481a-b4d2-3112e851fe8f/oai

Get citation
Distributive Justice: The Right and Wrong of Our Present Distribution of Wealth. (n.d.). gutenberg.org. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/42759

Receipt History
held for human review17 Oct 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work