trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Handwritten notes produce better conceptual learning than laptop-typed notes.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that handwritten notes produce better conceptual learning than laptop-typed notes?

Partly. A 2024 meta-analysis of 24 studies reports that taking and reviewing handwritten notes yields higher achievement than typing among college students, and one experiment found handwriting better on conceptual quiz questions. However, a 2026 listening-test study found no significant performance differences between handwriting and typing, and a 2025 study examined whether typing could help high-ADHD students, so the evidence covers achievement broadly rather than conceptual learning specifically and is mixed.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 3 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
2024
Get citation
Typed Versus Handwritten Lecture Notes and College Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. (2024). hal.science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09914-w

2 recorded entries grouped as this source

Additional records of the same source are shown below. They are not counted as additional sources.

2024
Get citation
Flanigan, A. E., Wheeler, J., Colliot, T., Lu, J., & Kiewra, K. A. (2024). Typed versus Handwritten Lecture Notes and College Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. eric.ed.gov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09914-w

Evidence against · 2
2025
Get citation
Shimko, G. A. & James, K. H. (2025). The Effects of Notetaking Modality and Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) on Learning. eric.ed.gov. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2025.2493257

See more details
More for · 2
2022
Get citation
Rosi-Schumacher, M. & DeGiovanni, J. C. (2022). Using the Lessons of Learning Science to Improve Medical Education in Otolaryngology.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613231160509

2020
Get citation
Crumb, R. M., Hildebrandt, R., & Sutton, T. M. (2020). The Value of Handwritten Notes: A Failure to Find State-Dependent Effects When Using a Laptop to Take Notes and Complete a Quiz. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320979895

2 recorded entries grouped as this source

Additional records of the same source are shown below. They are not counted as additional sources.

2022
Get citation
M., C. R., Ryan, H., & M., S. T. (2022). The Value of Handwritten Notes: A Failure to Find State-Dependent Effects When Using a Laptop to Take Notes and Complete a Quiz. eric.ed.gov. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320979895

More against · 1
2026
Get citation
Kim, J. (2026). Handwritten Versus Typed Notes: The Impact of Note‐Taking Modes in Second Language Listening Tests. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70185

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work