trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Humans have more olfactory receptors than dogs.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that humans have more olfactory receptors than dogs?

No. Multiple sources state that dogs have substantially more olfactory receptors than humans — roughly thirty to forty times as many, or about ten times the total receptor count. This directly contradicts the claim that humans have more.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

Evidence against · 4
Get citation
The dog and rat olfactory receptor repertoires. (n.d.). genomebiology.biomedcentral.com. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/gb-2005-6-10-r83

See more details
More against · 3
Get citation
Dog sense of smell - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_sense_of_smell

Get citation
Olfactory system-inspired electronic nose system using numerous low-cost homogenous and hetrogenous sensors. (n.d.). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295703

Get citation
apadictionaryofpsychology2015. (n.d.). archive.org. https://archive.org/details/apadictionaryofpsychology2015

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work