trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Height is an example of a continuous variable.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that height is an example of a continuous variable?

Unclear. Several statistics textbooks and references list height among continuous variables, and one defines continuous variables generally. None states the claim in full as a standalone assertion, but together they partially support it.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 4
Continuous or discrete variable
Get citation
Continuous or discrete variable. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_or_discrete_variable

See more details
More for · 3
Introductory Statistics
2020
Get citation
Mann, P. S. (2020). Introductory Statistics. play.google.com. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=UT8QEAAAQBAJ&source=gbs_api

Biostatistics
2018
Get citation
Daniel, W. W. & Cross, C. L. (2018). Biostatistics. play.google.com. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=M_zKDwAAQBAJ&source=gbs_api

Eliciting Effect Size - Shiny App
2019
Get citation
Claudio, Z. C., Enrico, T., & Gianmarco, A. (2019). Eliciting Effect Size - Shiny App. zenodo.org. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2564852

Receipt History
held for human review18 Oct 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work