trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

High construction costs are the main reason nuclear power is not used more widely.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that high construction costs are the main reason nuclear power is not used more widely?

Unclear. Two peer-reviewed sources indicate that construction costs are a significant factor in nuclear power's economic competitiveness, but none of the retrieved items establishes that high construction costs are the main reason nuclear power is not used more widely.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Economics of Nuclear Power : Construction Costs and Safety Regulation
Get citation
Escobar, L. (n.d.). Economics of Nuclear Power : Construction Costs and Safety Regulation. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.70675/4dd7332bz9144z4dbeza28fz12fb99498b41

See more details
More for · 2
Cost Escalation in Nuclear Power
1978
Get citation
David, M. W. & P., Q. J. (1978). Cost Escalation in Nuclear Power. authors.library.caltech.edu. https://doi.org/10.7907/Z9WH2MXR

Design features and cost reduction potential of JSFR
Get citation
Design features and cost reduction potential of JSFR. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.08.031

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work