trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Singapore's government matchmaking agency, the Social Development Unit, was established in 1984.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Singapore's government matchmaking agency, the Social Development Unit, was established in 1984?

Yes. Three reference sources state that Singapore's Social Development Unit was formed or created in 1984 as a government matchmaking body, matching the claim's date and description.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 4
Get citation
Social Development Network - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Development_Network

See more details
More for · 3
Get citation
Singapore. Social Development Unit.. (n.d.). n2t.net. http://n2t.net/ark:/99166/w6c045tk

2017
Get citation
Tamney, J. B. (2017). The Struggle over Singapore's Soul. play.google.com. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=Q3ldDwAAQBAJ&source=gbs_api

2009
Get citation
Koh, J. & Ho, L. (2009). Culture and Customs of Singapore and Malaysia. books.google.com. http://books.google.com/books?id=2JwaAQAAMAAJ&dq=Singapore%27s+government+matchmaking+agency,+the+Social+Development+Unit,+was+established+in+1984.&hl=&as_pt=BOOKS&source=gbs_api

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work