trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Humans are biologically members of the animal kingdom.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that humans are biologically members of the animal kingdom?

Yes. A human biology textbook states plainly that human beings are members of the animal kingdom, and a Wikipedia article on humans places humans within the animal kingdom and compares them to other apes.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Human - Wikipedia
Get citation
Human - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human

See more details
More for · 2
Human Biology
1992
Get citation
Mader, S. S. (1992). Human Biology. books.google.com. http://books.google.com/books?id=Wa5aAAAAYAAJ&dq=Humans+are+biologically+members+of+the+animal+kingdom.&hl=&as_pt=BOOKS&source=gbs_api

Production, Usage, and Comprehension in Animal Vocalizations
2010
Get citation
M., S. R. & L., C. D. (2010). Production, Usage, and Comprehension in Animal Vocalizations. eric.ed.gov. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.10.003

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work