trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Spectral models use timestep stability criteria based on maximum phase speeds similar to the CFL condition.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
1 source for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Peer-reviewed literature on numerical analysis confirms that spectral approximations to hyperbolic equations are governed by CFL-like stability conditions constraining the timestep.

The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

The recorded search did not run a separate search for evidence against it.

Evidence for · 1
Recorded source metadata

The CFL condition for spectral approximations to hyperbolic initial-boundary value problems. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0025-5718-1991-1066833-9

We study the stability of spectral approximations to scalar hyperbolic initial-boundary value problems with variable coefficients. Time is discretized by explicit multi-level or Runge-Kutta methods of order ≤ 3 \leq 3 (forward Euler time-differencing is included), and we study spatial discretizations by spectral and pseudospectral approximations associated with the general family of Jacobi polynomials. We prove that these fully explicit spectral approximations are stable provided their time step, Δ t \Delta t , is restricted by the CFL-like condition Δ t > Const ∙ N − 2 \Delta t > {\text {Const}} \bullet {N^{ - 2}} , where N equals the spatial number of degrees of freedom. We give two independent proofs of this result, depending on two different choices of appropriate L 2 {L^2} -weighted norms. In both approaches, the proofs hinge on a certain inverse inequality interesting for its own sake. Our result confirms the commonly held belief that the above CFL stability restriction, which is extensively used in practical implementations, guarantees the stability (and hence the convergence) of fully-explicit spectral approximations in the nonperiodic case.

See more details
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt