trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The US First Amendment permits limits on speech such as incitement to imminent lawless action and true threats.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the US First Amendment permits limits on speech such as incitement to imminent lawless action and true threats?

Unclear. Three reference items confirm that speech inciting imminent lawless action is unprotected under the First Amendment, but none of the retrieved sources addresses the true-threats exception, so only part of the claim is covered.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Imminent lawless action. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

See more details
More for · 2
2024
Get citation
Kasper, E. T. & Kozma, T. A. (2024). Imminent Lawless Action. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501774515.003.0007

Get citation
Freedom of speech in the United States. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work