trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Fewer than half of published psychology studies replicated successfully in the 2015 Open Science Collaboration project.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
6 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that fewer than half of published psychology studies replicated successfully in the 2015 Open Science Collaboration project?

Yes. The Open Science Collaboration's own 2015 paper reports that only 36 percent of replication attempts produced statistically significant results, and a contemporaneous commentary on that project states fewer than half of the replications yielded a significant effect. Other items cite the same project as showing fewer than half of psychology results replicated.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 6 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 6
Conceptual replication study and meta-analysis suggest simulated nature does not reliably restore pure executive attention measured by the attention network task
2021
Get citation
Conceptual replication study and meta-analysis suggest simulated nature does not reliably restore pure executive attention measured by the attention network task. (2021). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101709

See more details
More for · 5
Replication in Psychological Science
2015
Get citation
Replication in Psychological Science. (2015). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374

The Implications of "Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychology Science" for School Psychology Research
2016
Get citation
G., S. B. (2016). The Implications of "Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychology Science" for School Psychology Research. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1200368

PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
2015
Get citation
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.. (2015). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Replication and Computational Literary Studies
2020
Get citation
Christof, S., Karin, v. D., & Maria, A. (2020). Replication and Computational Literary Studies. zenodo.org. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3893428

Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis.
2018
Get citation
PE, S. & JL, R. (2018). Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work