trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

High sugar intake increases the risk of kidney stones.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that high sugar intake increases the risk of kidney stones?

Unclear. Three sources — an observational study report, an NHANES-based analysis, and a clinical diet page — associate higher added-sugar or sugar intake with increased kidney stone risk, but the study authors themselves describe the evidence as observational and call for further prospective research. No retrieved item settles the claim at full strength.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Consuming added sugars may increase risk of kidney stones. (n.d.). frontiersin.org. https://www.frontiersin.org/news/2023/08/04/frontiers-nutrition-association-added-sugar-intake-developing-kidney-stones

See more details
More for · 2
Get citation
Association between added sugars and kidney stones in U.S. adults: data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2018 - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1226082

Get citation
Kidney Stones Diet: What To Eat and Avoid. (n.d.). health.clevelandclinic.org. https://health.clevelandclinic.org/kidney-stones-diet

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work