trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Using Grammarly to edit a text can cause AI detectors to flag it as AI-generated.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that using Grammarly to edit a text can cause AI detectors to flag it as AI-generated?

Unclear. The retrieved sources show that AI detectors produce false positives on human writing and that paraphrasing or humanizing tools can change detection outcomes, but none directly tests whether Grammarly-edited human text gets flagged as AI-generated. The evidence therefore only partially supports the mechanism behind the claim.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 5
Enhancing the Robustness of AI-Generated Text Detectors: A Survey
2025
Get citation
Liu, X., Li, Y., & Li, K. (2025). Enhancing the Robustness of AI-Generated Text Detectors: A Survey. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132145

See more details
More for · 4
The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors
2023
Get citation
Walters, W. H. (2023). The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2022-0158

Evaluating the Effectiveness of AI Text Humanising Tools in Reducing AI Detection in AI-Generated Texts by AI Detectors
2026
Get citation
Epaphras, S. N. & Mtenzi, F. (2026). Evaluating the Effectiveness of AI Text Humanising Tools in Reducing AI Detection in AI-Generated Texts by AI Detectors. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.37284/ijar.9.1.4683

Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text
2023
Get citation
Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., & Popoola, O. (2023). Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text. eric.ed.gov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z

What Does YouTube Advise Students about Bypassing AI-Text Detection Tools? A Pragmatic Analysis
2026
Get citation
Foltýnek, T. & Newton, P. M. (2026). What Does YouTube Advise Students about Bypassing AI-Text Detection Tools? A Pragmatic Analysis. eric.ed.gov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09675-3

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work