trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Germany's nuclear shutdown increased reliance on coal power.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Germany's nuclear shutdown increased reliance on coal power?

Yes. A peer-reviewed study of Germany's post-Fukushima phase-out found the lost nuclear generation was replaced primarily by coal-fired production, and a 2025 synthetic-control analysis found increased reliance on fossil fuels, particularly coal, in the short term.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 4
Get citation
Nuclear power in Germany - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_Germany

See more details
More for · 3
2019
Get citation
The Private and External Costs of Germany's Nuclear Phase-Out. (2019). ssrn.com. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3511308

2025
Get citation
L, L., L, R., & R, S. (2025). Nuclear phase-out: Can we catch up on CO2 emissions?. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336218

2012
Get citation
The economic costs of the nuclear phase-out in Germany. (2012). hal.science. https://hal.science/hal-01609472v1

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work