trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Regular use of AI tutors reduces students' critical thinking skills.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that regular use of AI tutors reduces students' critical thinking skills?

Partly. Evidence on this claim is partial and mixed: a position paper and a qualitative study raise concerns that unchecked AI use may harm critical thinking, while one survey-style paper says AI tools support learning when used properly. None of the retrieved items measures a change in students' critical thinking skills from regular AI tutor use.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 3 sources for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Do AI tutors empower or enslave learners? Toward a critical use of AI in education
Get citation
Do AI tutors empower or enslave learners? Toward a critical use of AI in education. (n.d.). arxiv.org. https://arxiv.org/html/2507.06878v1

Evidence against · 1
AWARENESS AND UTILIZATION OF AI TOOLS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE COLLEGE STUDENTS OF DOMBIVLI
2026
Get citation
Kale, A. P. A. A. (2026). AWARENESS AND UTILIZATION OF AI TOOLS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE COLLEGE STUDENTS OF DOMBIVLI. zenodo.org. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18641094

See more details
More for · 2
How University students in Bangladesh engage with ChatGPT: A qualitative study.
2025
Get citation
M, H. & MS, I. (2025). How University students in Bangladesh engage with ChatGPT: A qualitative study.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333089

Perception of Medical Undergraduates on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Qualitative Exploration.
2025
Get citation
T, S., K, K., I, A., & W, P. (2025). Perception of Medical Undergraduates on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Qualitative Exploration.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2196/73798

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work