The risks of circumcision include a low risk of bleeding, infection or scarring.

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the risks of circumcision include a low risk of bleeding, infection or scarring?

Yes. Clinical literature consistently demonstrates that circumcision carries a low risk of manageable complications such as bleeding, infection, and localized wound issues.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked 4 Oct 2026

The analysis

The claim states that the risks of circumcision include a low risk of bleeding, infection, or scarring. Multiple retrieved papers directly discuss and evaluate these specific complications (bleeding, infection, and wound outcomes) in clinical circumcision cohorts and network meta-analyses, supporting the claim that these are well-documented, low-frequency risks. Therefore, the balance verdict is SUPPORTED.

Evidence for · 5

Clinical outcomes of circumcisions and prevalence of complications of male circumcisions: A five-year retrospective analysis at a teaching hospital in Ghana.

2025

Get citation

S, A. B. & F, O. (2025). Clinical outcomes of circumcisions and prevalence of complications of male circumcisions: A five-year retrospective analysis at a teaching hospital in Ghana.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003788

See more details

More for · 4

Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and early complications of conventional circumcision techniques and thermocautery-assisted circumcision.

2025

Get citation

B, K., C, B., MT, Ö., K, T., S, S., A, Ç., & MÖ, Y. (2025). Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and early complications of conventional circumcision techniques and thermocautery-assisted circumcision.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91730-5

"Bisection method" sleeve circumcision in patients with redundant prepuce and phimosis: a clinical comparative study.

2026

Get citation

C, W., J, B., F, Z., D, Z., & G, Z. (2026). "Bisection method" sleeve circumcision in patients with redundant prepuce and phimosis: a clinical comparative study.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-026-06722-5

Safety, Complications, and Procedural Efficiency of Neonatal Circumcision Devices: A Network Meta-Analysis.

2026

Get citation

AN, A., MA, M., HU, J., H, Y., MM, A., & M, M. (2026). Safety, Complications, and Procedural Efficiency of Neonatal Circumcision Devices: A Network Meta-Analysis.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2026.0167

Clinical Outcomes of Plastibell Circumcision in Infants Below Three Months of Age: A Retrospective Study From a Tertiary Care Center.

2026

Get citation

B, Q., MS, A., M, E., QU, Z., M, A., AM, A., J, A., A, A., MS, A., & AK, B. (2026). Clinical Outcomes of Plastibell Circumcision in Infants Below Three Months of Age: A Retrospective Study From a Tertiary Care Center.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.104105

What does the evidence say?

Receipt History

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work