trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Regular cola consumption damages the kidneys and raises the risk of chronic kidney disease.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that regular cola consumption damages the kidneys and raises the risk of chronic kidney disease?

Unclear. One preliminary case-control study reports that drinking two or more colas daily was associated with higher odds of chronic kidney disease, and a rat study examined kidney effects of chronic cola consumption. Neither settles that regular cola consumption damages human kidneys or raises CKD risk at the strength the claim asserts.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
Beneficial Effect of Moderate Exercise in Kidney of Rat after Chronic Consumption of Cola Drinks
2016
Get citation
Cao, G., González, J., Müller, A., Ottaviano, G., Ambrosio, G., & Toblli, J. E. (2016). Beneficial Effect of Moderate Exercise in Kidney of Rat after Chronic Consumption of Cola Drinks. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152461

See more details
More for · 1
Carbonated Beverages and Chronic Kidney Disease -
Get citation
Carbonated Beverages and Chronic Kidney Disease - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3180646338

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work