trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

People often fail to notice missing or repeated words in their own writing because the brain fills in expected text during reading.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that people often fail to notice missing or repeated words in their own writing because the brain fills in expected text during reading?

Unclear. The retrieved items only partially support the claim: one study questions whether people detect incoherence in conversation, and another shows people often miss unexpected objects during attention-demanding tasks. Neither directly addresses the brain filling in expected text while reading one's own writing.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
Do We Notice when Communication Goes Awry? An Investigation of People's Sensitivity to Coherence in Spontaneous Conversation
2014
Get citation
Galantucci, B. & Roberts, G. (2014). Do We Notice when Communication Goes Awry? An Investigation of People's Sensitivity to Coherence in Spontaneous Conversation. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103182

See more details
More for · 1
Individual differences in inattentional blindness
2024
Get citation
Individual differences in inattentional blindness. (2024). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02431-x

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work