trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

A closure of the Strait of Hormuz would raise oil and gasoline prices in the United States.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that a closure of the Strait of Hormuz would raise oil and gasoline prices in the United States?

Unclear. Several sources indicate that a closure of the Strait of Hormuz would disrupt global oil supply and push oil prices higher, and one mentions US domestic inflationary pressure, but none directly establishes the effect on US oil and gasoline prices as the claim states.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 4
2012
Get citation
Center, D. T. I. (2012). DTIC ADA584459: Iran's Threat to the Strait of Hormuz. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/DTIC_ADA584459

See more details
More for · 3
2026
Get citation
Zamani, M. (2026). Implications of the 2026 Strait of Hormuz Closure. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6467199

2026
Get citation
Dampak Penutupan Selat Hormuz 2026 terhadap Keamanan Pasokan Minyak di Kawasan Timur Tengah. (2026). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.56127/jushpen.v5i1.2717

2008
Get citation
Closing Time: Assessing the Iranian Threat to the Strait of Hormuz. (2008). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.33.1.82

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work