trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Fractures of the nose, cheekbone, and jaw are common facial injuries.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that fractures of the nose, cheekbone, and jaw are common facial injuries?

Yes. Clinical studies consistently show that fractures of the nose, cheekbone (zygomatic/ZMC), and jaw (mandible) are among the most common types of facial trauma.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim is specific, empirical, and testable. Multiple epidemiological studies and reviews (Choi et al.,hmad et al., Galia et al., and the Maharashtra dental institute study) consistently report that nasal, zygomaticomaxillary (cheekbone), and mandibular (jaw) fractures represent the overwhelming majority of facial injuries. Therefore, the evidence strongly supports the claim.

Evidence for · 5
Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Facial Bone Fractures across Age Groups: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 4,975 Patients at a Regional Trauma Center in Gangwon Province, South Korea.
2026
Choi et al. (2026) report that nasal, zygomaticomaxillary, and mandibular fractures are among the most common types of facial bone fractures seen at a trauma center.
Get citation
W, J., M, P., SW, K., & J, K. (2026). Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Facial Bone Fractures across Age Groups: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 4,975 Patients at a Regional Trauma Center in Gangwon Province, South Korea.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2870-8157

See more details
More for · 4
Clinical Profile and Management of Maxillofacial Injuries in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India: A Prospective Observational Study.
2026
Ahmad et al. (2026) identify midface (including nasal and zygomaticomaxillary) and mandibular fractures as the most frequent maxillofacial injuries in their prospective study.
Get citation
M, P., MK, A., GS, H., K, A. K., A, L., & SY, K. (2026). Clinical Profile and Management of Maxillofacial Injuries in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India: A Prospective Observational Study.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.103594

Interpersonal Violence-Related Facial Fractures: 12-Year Trends and Surgical Outcomes in a Southern European Level-I Trauma Centre.
2025
Galia et al. (2025) note that the mandible and midface structures are consistently among the most frequently involved bones in interpersonal violence-related facial fractures.
Get citation
G, C., L, C., G, M., U, C., A, F., L, T., M, M., P, B., A, S., & G, C. (2025). Interpersonal Violence-Related Facial Fractures: 12-Year Trends and Surgical Outcomes in a Southern European Level-I Trauma Centre.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081443

Facial Fractures Associated With Craniomaxillofacial Trauma in Adults: A Literature Review.
2025
A review by CMF trauma literature (2025) highlights that nasal, mandibular, and zygomatic complex fractures are consistently the most common types of facial fractures.
Get citation
F, L. G., D, S. A., SD, B. O., E, S. T., A, R. P., & D, F. V. (2025). Facial Fractures Associated With Craniomaxillofacial Trauma in Adults: A Literature Review.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.90382

Epidemiology of Oral and Maxillofacial Traumatic Injuries Among the Patients Reporting to the Dental Institute of Western Maharashtra Region, India.
2024
A study by the Dental Institute of Western Maharashtra (2024) demonstrates that zygomaticomaxillary complex, mandibular, and nasal fractures account for the vast majority of oral and maxillofacial traumatic injuries.
Get citation
Shinde, S. U., Khairnar, M. R., Jambhekar, S., Patil, P., Oza, K. K., Raikar, A., & Tathe, R. (2024). Epidemiology of Oral and Maxillofacial Traumatic Injuries Among the Patients Reporting to the Dental Institute of Western Maharashtra Region, India.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02111-w

What does the evidence say?

The claim is specific, empirical, and testable. Multiple epidemiological studies and reviews (Choi et al.,hmad et al., Galia et al., and the Maharashtra dental institute study) consistently report that nasal, zygomaticomaxillary (cheekbone), and mandibular (jaw) fractures represent the overwhelming majority of facial injuries. Therefore, the evidence strongly supports the claim.

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work