✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The Nazis deliberately set the 1933 Reichstag fire rather than Marinus van der Lubbe acting alone.
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 3 against
Is it true that the Nazis deliberately set the 1933 Reichstag fire rather than Marinus van der Lubbe acting alone?
Unclear. Several reference and peer-reviewed items report a historian consensus that Marinus van der Lubbe set the Reichstag fire acting alone with no Nazi involvement, which runs against the claim of a deliberate Nazi plot. However, these items describe the state of the debate rather than definitively settling the claim, and one item notes the single-culprit narrative's origins are themselves contested.
Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 0 sources for, 3 against · Last checked
Evidence against · 3
Get citation
Reichstag fire. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire
See more details
More against · 2
“This Story Is about Something Fundamental”: Nazi Criminals, History, Memory, and the Reichstag Fire
Get citation
“This Story Is about Something Fundamental”: Nazi Criminals, History, Memory, and the Reichstag Fire. (2015). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008938915000345
Get citation
La fabrique du complot: de l'usage de l'incendie du Reichstag par les propagandes nazie et communiste. (2024). opac.k10plus.de. https://opac.k10plus.de/
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work