✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The US government's Stargate Project, which funded remote viewing research, was ended in 1995 after a review concluded it had not produced actionable intelligence.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that the US government's Stargate Project, which funded remote viewing research, was ended in 1995 after a review concluded it had not produced actionable intelligence?
Yes. Two reference sources state the Stargate Project was terminated and declassified in 1995 after a CIA-commissioned review concluded it had not produced actionable intelligence; two further sources confirm the program's failure and 1995 demise but do not detail the review's conclusion.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
Evidence for · 4
Get citation
Stargate Project (U.S. Army unit) - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stargate_Project_(U.S._Army_unit)
See more details
More for · 3
Get citation
Miyamoto, K. (2018). Failure and Success of the Project STARGATE to Develop the Remote Viewing Capacity. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3286134
Get citation
The CIA Recruited 'Mind Readers' to Spy on the Soviets in the 1970s | HISTORY. (n.d.). history.com. https://www.history.com/articles/cia-esp-espionage-soviet-union-cold-war
Get citation
Does Stanford University conduct research into psychic spies?. (2016). skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/35412/does-stanford-university-conduct-research-into-psychic-spies
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work