trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

A single bad LSD trip causes permanent psychological damage.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that a single bad LSD trip causes permanent psychological damage?

Unclear. The retrieved items only partially address the claim: a small controlled study of single-dose LSD in healthy volunteers found no lasting psychological problems at one and twelve months, and older reviews found minimal evidence of persisting damage from LSD use. None of the items directly studies whether a single bad trip causes permanent psychological damage.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 4
Get citation
Long-lasting subjective effects of LSD in normal subjects - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4733-3

See more details
More against · 3
1967
Get citation
F., Y. S. (1967). [Statement on Recent Research on LSD, Marihuana, and Other Dangerous Drugs.]. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED024967

1971
Get citation
NI, D., WD, L., RE, M., & WR, L. (1971). LSD and genetic damage.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.172.3982.431

1971
Get citation
I., D. N. & Others, A. (1971). LSD and Genetic Damage. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ038946

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work