trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Chemtrails are a real government spraying program.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that chemtrails are a real government spraying program?

No. A Wikipedia overview states chemtrails have been dismissed by the scientific community and that purported chemtrails are normal water-based contrails, and a peer-reviewed survey of atmospheric experts found no support for a secret large-scale spraying program.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 4
2016
Get citation
Christine, S., J, D. S., & Mick, W. (2016). Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program. inis.iaea.org. https://inis.iaea.org/records/14mqh-cda47

See more details
More against · 3
Get citation
Friend believes chemtrails are triggering her son's asthma. (n.d.). parenting.stackexchange.com. https://parenting.stackexchange.com/questions/27706

Get citation
Chemtrail conspiracy theory - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory

2017
Get citation
Tingley, D. & Wagner, G. (2017). Solar geoengineering and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0014-3

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work