Optimality Theory explains phonological typology and cross-linguistic constraints that rule-based phonology cannot
Peer-reviewed literature demonstrates that Optimality Theory explains typological markedness implications and cross-linguistic constraints through universal constraints.
rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+4p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency
Listeners' knowledge of phonological universals: Evidence from nasal clusters.. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675709001729
Optimality Theory explains typological markedness implications by proposing that all speakers possess universal constraints penalizing marked structure, irrespective of the evidence provided by their language (Prince & Smolensky, 1993/2004). An account of phonological perception sketched here entails that markedness constraints reveal their presence by inducing perceptual 'repairs' to structures ungrammatical in the hearer's language. As onset clusters of falling sonority are typologically marked relative to those of rising sonority (Greenberg, 1978), we examine English speakers' perception of nasal-initial clusters-lacking in English. We find greater accuracy for rising-sonority clusters, evidencing knowledge of markedness constraints favoring such onset clusters. The misperception of sonority falls cannot be accounted for by stimulus artifacts (the materials are perceived accurately by speakers of Russian-a language allowing nasal-initial clusters) nor by phonetic failure (English speakers misperceive falls even with printed materials) nor by putative relations of such onsets to the statistics of the English lexicon. English Français Phonology Article contents Abstract References Listeners' knowledge of phonological universals: evidence from nasal clusters * Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 June 2009 Iris Berent , Tracy Lennertz , Paul Smolensky and Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum Show author details Iris Berent Affiliation: Northeastern University Tracy Lennertz Affiliation: Northeastern University Paul Smolensky Affiliation: Johns Hopkins University Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum Affiliation: University of Haifa and The Western Galilee College Article Supplementary materials Metrics Article contents Abstract References Get access Share Cite Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window] Abstract Optimality Theory explains typological markedness implications by proposing that all speakers possess universal constraints penalising marked structures, irrespective of the evidence provided by their language (Prince & Smolensky 2004 ). PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Google Scholar Boersma , Paul ( 2007 ). Some listener-oriented accounts of h -aspiré in French . Lingua 117 . 1989 – 2054 . CrossRef Google Scholar Boersma , Paul & Hamann , Silke ( 2008 ). Loanword adaptation as first-language phonological perception. Available as ROA-975 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive. Google Scholar Boersma , Paul & Hamann , Silke (to appear). Introduction to ‘Phonology in perception’. In Boersma , Paul & Hamann , Silke (eds.) Phonology in perception . Berlin & New York : Mouton de Gruyter . CrossRef Google Scholar Broselow , Ellen , Chen , Su-I & Wang , Chilin ( Google Scholar Gouskova , Maria ( 2004 ). Relational hierarchies in Optimality Theory: the case of syllable contact . Phonology 21 . 201 – 250 . CrossRef Google Scholar Greenberg , Joseph H. ( 1978 ). Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In Greenberg , Joseph H. , Ferguson , Charles A. & Moravcsik , Edith A. (eds.) Universals of human language . Vol. 2: Phonology . Stanford : Stanford University Press . 243 – 279 . Google Scholar Hallé , Pierre A. , Segui , Juan , Frauenfelder , Uli & Meunier , Christine ( 1998 ). Processing of illegal consonant clusters: a case of perceptual assimilation? Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs . Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1 . 476 – 490 . CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed McCarthy , John J. ( 1979 ). Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology . PhD dissertation, MIT. Published 1985, New York : Garland. Google Scholar Massaro , Dominic W. & Cohen , Michael M. ( 1983 ). Phonological context in speech perception . Perception and Psychophysics 34 . 338 – 348 . CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed Morelli , Frida ( 1999 ). The phonotactics and phonology of obstruent clusters in Optimality Theory . PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park . Google Scholar Moreton , Elliott ( 2002 ). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 . 497 – 508 . CrossRef Google Scholar Pitt , Mark ( 1998 ). Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters . Perception and Psychophysics 60 . 941 – 951 . CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed Prince , Alan & Smolensky , Paul ( 2004 ). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar . Malden, Mass. & Oxford : Blackwell . CrossRef Google Scholar Romani , Cristina & Calabrese , Andrea ( 1998 ). Syllabic constraints on the phonological errors of an aphasic patient . Brain and Language 64 . 83 – 121 . CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed Saussure , Ferdinand de ( 1916 ). Cours de linguistique générale . Lausanne & Paris: Payot. Translated 1959 as Course in general linguistics . New York : Philosophical Library . Google Scholar Selkirk , Elisabeth O. ( 1984 ). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff , Mark & Oerhle , Richard T. (eds.) Language sound structure . Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press . 107 – 136 . Google Scholar Silverman , Daniel ( 1992 ). Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: evidence from Cantonese . Phonology 9 . 289 – 328 . CrossRef Google Scholar Smolensky , Paul ( 2006 ). Optimality in phonology II: harmonic completeness, local constraint conjunction, and feature domain markedness. In Smolensky & Legendre (2006: vol. 2 ). 27 – 160 . 3, p. 143. CrossRef Google Scholar Berent, Iris Lennertz, Tracy and Balaban, Evan 2012. Language Universals and Misidentification: A Two-way Street . Language and Speech, Vol. 55, Issue. 3, p. 311. CrossRef Google Scholar Hayes, Bruce and White, James 2013. Phonological Naturalness and Phonotactic Learning . Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 45. CrossRef Google Scholar de Lacy, Paul and Kingston, John 2013. Synchronic explanation . Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 31, Issue. 2, p. 287. CrossRef Google Scholar Berent, Iris Vaknin-Nusbaum, Vered Balaban, Evan and Galaburda, Albert M. 2013.
See more details
Weight typology: An Optimality Theoretic approach. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2003.011
This paper reviews the descriptive generalizations regarding segment weight, and provides an Optimality Theory (OT) analysis that both confirms and challenges traditional typological expectations. Ultimately, the predictions of factorial ranking provide a means by which to examine the adequacy of individual OT analyses and a metric by which to re-examine our assumptions about linguistic patterns and the nature of phonological typology. Descriptively, weight is shown to come in two flavors, coerced and distinctive. Each is relevant to both consonants and vowels, and each has its own generalizations - an implicational relationship between coerced weight and segment sonority, but no such relationship between distinctive weight and sonority. Theoretically, the factorial ranking of a small set of constraints not only explains the descriptive generalizations, but also results in some unexpected predictions that are, in fact, empirically supported.
Optimality Theory in Phonology. 2008. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=f0HduZkJEPUC&source=gbs_api
The 33 selections cover a broad range of topics in phonology and include many of the foundational works, some of them revised to reflect the most recent developments. Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader is a collection of readings on this important new theory by leading figures in the field, including a lengthy excerpt from Prince and Smolensky’s never-before-published Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Compiles the most important readings about Optimality Theory in phonology from some of the most prominent researchers in the field. Contains 33 excerpts spanning a range of topics in phonology and including many never-before-published papers. Includes a lengthy excerpt from Prince and Smolensky’s foundational 1993 manuscript Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Includes introductory notes and study/research questions for each chapter.
Optimality Theory in Phonology. 2004. http://books.google.com/books?id=Wv9JnwEACAAJ&dq=Optimality+Theory+explains+phonological+typology+and+cross-linguistic+constraints+that+rule-based+phonology+cannot&hl=&as_pt=BOOKS&source=gbs_api
Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader is a collection of readings on this important new theory by leading figures in the field, starting with a lengthy excerpt from the original source, Prince and Smolensky’s never-before-published ... Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader is a collection of readings on this important new theory by leading figures in the field, starting with a lengthy excerpt from the original source, Prince and Smolensky’s never-before-published report Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. The 33 selections cover a broad range of topics in phonology and include many of the foundational works, some of them revised to reflect the most recent developments. Optimality Theory in Phonology is designed as a text for advanced phonology courses, but is also of interest as a reference work for scholars in the field of linguistics and related disciplines. Each chapter includes introductory notes to set the stage and highlight connections, as well as a list of study and research questi
Opacity and Sound Change in the Polish Lexicon. 2003. https://doi.org/10.7282/t3319tpp
The main goal of this dissertation is to provide a generative account of phonological opacity within a framework built upon direct mapping in the synchronic grammar without abstract intermediate representations, as in standard Optimality Theory (OT; Prince and Smolensky 1993/2002). Such a framework predicts that certain types of opacity cannot be synchronically productive. take this prediction seriously and develop an analysis in which opacity is shown to arise from the interaction of sound change and a strong version of Prince and Smolensky's principle of lexicon optimization, in which the underlying lexicon is 'optimized' by becoming more faithful to the surface pronunciation. This interaction results in a progressive encoding of sound changes directly into the evolving lexicon, mirroring the stepwise effect of multistratal derivations, but diachronically rather than synchronically, preserving direct mapping. The specific theoretical framework used in this dissertation is Faithfulness, Dispersion, and Markedness in OT (FDM-OT), which differs from standard OT by offering a functional account of sound change and synchronic phonology through the interaction of faithfulness (along the lines of McCarthy and Prince 1995), dispersion (generalized from Dispersion Theory (Flemming 1995, Padgett 1997, and Ní Chiosáin and Padgett 2001)), and universally ranked articulatory markedness constraints. Grounded in cognition, acoustics, and articulation, FDM-OT explains and predicts phonolog
Word-formation in optimality theory. https://www.europeana.eu/item/2048427/item_NF46XELMZU3HVAPRZPB6DXBKDPNQ53HC?utm_source=api&utm_medium=api&utm_campaign=onnander
Optimality theory (henceforth OT) models natural language competence in terms of interactions of universal constraints, notably markedness and faithfulness constraints. This article illustrates some of the major advances in the understanding of word-formation phenomena originating from this theory, including the prosodic organization of morphologically complex words, neutralization patterns in derivational affixes, allomorphy, and infixation.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt