trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The planet Mercury has no natural moons.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the planet Mercury has no natural moons?

Yes. A peer-reviewed review of moon formation states that among the terrestrial planets Mercury and Venus have no moons, and a reference text on the Solar System likewise states that Mercury has no moons.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
Get citation
The Formation of the Martian Moons. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.013.24

See more details
More for · 1
Get citation
Solar System/Mercury. (n.d.). en.wikibooks.org. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Solar_System/Mercury

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work