trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The United Nations General Assembly designated 2 October, Gandhi's birthday, as the International Day of Non-Violence in a 2007 resolution.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the United Nations General Assembly designated 2 October, Gandhi's birthday, as the International Day of Non-Violence in a 2007 resolution?

Yes. Three sources, including the UN's own observance page and UN Web TV, state that the General Assembly established 2 October, Gandhi's birthday, as the International Day of Non-Violence by resolution A/RES/61/271 of 15 June 2007.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
International Day of Non-Violence - Wikipedia
Get citation
International Day of Non-Violence - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Day_of_Non-Violence

See more details
More for · 2
International Day of Non-Violence | United Nations
Get citation
International Day of Non-Violence | United Nations. (n.d.). un.org. https://www.un.org/en/observances/non-violence-day

Commemoration of International Day of Non-Violence | UN Web TV
Get citation
Commemoration of International Day of Non-Violence | UN Web TV. (n.d.). webtv.un.org. https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k12/k12uwilpsa

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work