trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Technology alone can solve the problem of poor data quality.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 8 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that technology alone can solve the problem of poor data quality?

No. Evidence shows that technology alone cannot resolve poor data quality or systemic operational problems; organizational culture, human workflows, management commitment, and standardized protocols are also essential.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 8 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim asserts that technology alone can solve poor data quality. Multiple studies across health informatics, information systems, and organizational management consistently demonstrate that data quality and safety outcomes depend just as heavily on organizational culture, human factors, process controls, management commitment, and user training. Therefore, the claim is refuted by the literature, which emphasizes sociotechnical and multifaceted approaches rather than purely technological ones.

Evidence against · 8
2015
Get citation
Xu, H. (2015). What Are the Most Important Factors for Accounting Information Quality and Their Impact on AIS Data Quality Outcomes?. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700833

See more details
More against · 7
2026
Get citation
MSR, J. (2026). From emergence to recoverability: a sociotechnical control trajectory theory of HIT-related risk.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1811981

2026
Get citation
V, F., N, C., & MJ, C. (2026). Improving the Quality of Nursing Care Through Clinical Alarm Management in Intensive Care Units: An Integrative Review.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14172720

2026
Get citation
S, W., E, S., ZA, P., N, M., & D, A. (2026). Digital capability as a multilevel construct: a systematic literature review of its dimensions, antecedents, and consequences.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1859025

2026
Get citation
KA, A., A, A., AO, B., AM, A., H, A., & MB, R. (2026). BIM-Supported green building adoption in the construction industry.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356894

2026
Get citation
A, G., P, M., C, M., G, S., D, B., & S, P. (2026). Characteristics of Communication Competency in Nurse Managers: A Systematic Review.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14172814

2026
Get citation
NA, B., RA, A., S, A., EM, A., A, A., & SH, S. (2026). Factors Influencing Patient Safety Incident Reporting and Evidence-Based Improvement Strategies Among Healthcare Professionals in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review Aligned with Vision 2030.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s631152

2026
Get citation
X, L. & J, W. (2026). Identification of key control points in instrument reprocessing of hospital central sterile supply department and its association analysis with surgical site infection.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1844524

What does the evidence say?

The claim asserts that technology alone can solve poor data quality. Multiple studies across health informatics, information systems, and organizational management consistently demonstrate that data quality and safety outcomes depend just as heavily on organizational culture, human factors, process controls, management commitment, and user training. Therefore, the claim is refuted by the literature, which emphasizes sociotechnical and multifaceted approaches rather than purely technological ones.

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work