trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

ChatGPT's replies are written by real human beings rather than software.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that ChatGPT's replies are written by real human beings rather than software?

Unclear. Two peer-reviewed sources describe ChatGPT as an LLM-driven chatbot that generates its own responses, contrasting them with replies written by humans; neither directly states that no human writes ChatGPT's replies.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 0 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 2
ChatGPT: perspectives from human-computer interaction and psychology.
2024
Get citation
J, L. (2024). ChatGPT: perspectives from human-computer interaction and psychology.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1418869

See more details
More against · 1
Comparison of physician and large language model chatbot responses to online ear, nose, and throat inquiries
Get citation
Comparison of physician and large language model chatbot responses to online ear, nose, and throat inquiries. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06769-1

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work