trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

High cholesterol is linked to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
1 source for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that high cholesterol is linked to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes?

Partly. One animal study in Ossabaw swine partially supports the idea that increased cholesterol contributes to type 2 diabetes, while reference sources describe high cholesterol as a consequence or cardiovascular risk factor in diabetes rather than a cause of it. No human study retrieved directly measures high cholesterol as a risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 1 source for, 3 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 1
2008
Get citation
Increased cholesterol is vital to the development of coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes in Ossabaw swine. (2008). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.22.1_supplement.1152.18

Evidence against · 3
Get citation
High cholesterol. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_cholesterol

See more details
More against · 2
Get citation
Type 2 diabetes. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_2_diabetes

2008
Get citation
Cancer and cholesterol: understanding the V-shaped association in patients with diabetes. (2008). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081069

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work