trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Electromagnetic fields inside hybrid cars harm the health of drivers and passengers.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that electromagnetic fields inside hybrid cars harm the health of drivers and passengers?

Partly. The retrieved items only partially address the claim: one review suggests electromagnetic fields can disturb cellular processes and another suggests artificial fields might disrupt body functions, while a reference work treats general EMF harm claims as unsubstantiated. None of the items measures health outcomes specifically in hybrid-car drivers and passengers.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 2 sources for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
1995
Get citation
L., W. G. & Others, A. (1995). Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields: A Review of Literature.. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ514227

Evidence against · 1
Get citation
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_hypersensitivity

See more details
More for · 1
2025
Get citation
Nelson, I. (2025). Exploring the influence of Schumann resonance and electromagnetic fields on bioelectricity and human health.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2025.2508466

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work