trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The collision of more than 20 large pieces of Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 with Jupiter occurred in the summer of 1994.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the collision of more than 20 large pieces of Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 with Jupiter occurred in the summer of 1994?

Yes. Multiple reliable reference and scientific sources confirm that more than 20 fragments of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 collided with Jupiter in July 1994.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the historical reference record, not journal abstracts.

Evidence for · 5
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Jupiter. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter

See more details
More for · 4
Documents observations of the collision in July 1994.
Get citation
arXiv: arXiv: Speckle interferometric observations of the collision of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter. (n.d.). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9910510

Confirms chunks of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 slammed into Jupiter in 1994.
Get citation
LibreTexts: LibreTexts: 16.02%3A Nebular theory. (n.d.). LibreTexts. https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Geology/Historical_Geology_(Bentley_et_al.)/16%3A_(Case_Study)_Nebular_theory_and_the_formation_of_the_solar_system/16.02%3A_Nebular_theory

Notes that comet fragments broke into about 20 pieces and crashed into Jupiter in July 1994.
Get citation
OpenStax: OpenStax Astronomy: 13.4 The Origin and Fate of Comets and Related Objects. (n.d.). OpenStax. https://openstax.org/books/astronomy/pages/9aca755b-b169-427f-b460-894e739504b5@

Confirms the comet crashed into Jupiter in July 1994.
Get citation
Wikibooks: Wikibooks: Celestia/Add-Ons. (n.d.). Wikibooks. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Celestia/Add-Ons

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work