trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Imagination can be improved with training.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that imagination can be improved with training?

Unclear. Three studies report that imagination or creative imagination improved after training: a randomized study of spaced creative-imagination training in undergraduates, a longitudinal creative-writing experiment with primary school children, and a conceptual review of theater-game training. Each covers a specific population and training modality rather than the general claim.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
1988
Get citation
G., M. W. & A., H. S. (1988). Effects of Spaced Training in Creative Imagination and Delayed Posttesting on Originality.. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED304596

See more details
More for · 2
Get citation
「インプロ」の応用可能性に関する考察 −ヴァイオラ・スポーリンのシアターゲームの視座から−. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.20569/00005909

2025
Get citation
Effects of daily creative writing practice at school on the cognitive development of children from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds. (2025). hal.science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101881

Receipt History
held for human review18 Oct 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work