✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Women are more likely than men to leave STEM careers.
the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 2 against
Is it true that women are more likely than men to leave STEM careers?
Partly. Several studies report women leaving STEM majors or the pipeline more often than men, though most cover college majors or calculus rather than careers. Other research finds the gender retention gap in engineering and the bachelor's-to-PhD pipeline has narrowed or is explained by labor-force exit and childbearing.
Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 5 sources for, 2 against · Last checked
Evidence for · 5
Get citation
Why women leave STEM: the role of stereotypes. (2020). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.21064/winrs.2020.2.6
Evidence against · 2
Get citation
Are recent cohorts of women with engineering bachelors less likely to stay in engineering?. (2015). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01144
See more details
More for · 4
Get citation
Ellis, J., Fosdick, B., & Rasmussen, C. (2015). Women 1.5 Times More Likely to Leave STEM Pipeline After Calculus Compared to Men: Lack of Mathematical Confidence a Potential Culprit. arxiv.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447
Get citation
Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Fields. (2019). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.5hxr-h4jn
Get citation
Mónica, M., Antonio, M., & P., G. J. (2021). A Quantitative Analysis of the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Programs within Vocational Education and Training in Spain. zenodo.org. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5847010
Get citation
Appianing, J. & Eck, R. N. V. (2018). Development and validation of the Value-Expectancy STEM Assessment Scale for students in higher education. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0121-8
More against · 1
Get citation
Miller, D. I. & eWai, J. (2015). The Bachelor’s to PhD STEM Pipeline No Longer Leaks More Women Than Men: A 30-Year Analysis. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00037
Receipt History
held for human review17 Oct 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work