trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Recent scientific evidence strongly supports splitting the combination measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that recent scientific evidence strongly supports splitting the combination measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine?

Unclear. The retrieved items do not address whether recent scientific evidence supports splitting the MMR vaccine; the two vaccine-related items only describe combined MMR use and combined administration studies, which do not establish the claim either way.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 0 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 2
Rubella vaccine
Get citation
Rubella vaccine. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubella_vaccine

See more details
More against · 1
Combined administration of measles, mumps, rubella, and trivalent oral poliovirus vaccines.Search
Get citation
Combined administration of measles, mumps, rubella, and trivalent oral poliovirus vaccines.Search. (n.d.). stacks.cdc.gov. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/65326

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work