trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Cycling increases the risk of testicular cancer in men.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that cycling increases the risk of testicular cancer in men?

No. A reference source states there is no scientific evidence linking cycling with testicular cancer, directly contradicting the claim. A review article addresses the same question but reports no finding of its own.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 1
Get citation
Cycling. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycling

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work