trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

In persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities, socio-emotional processing networks may be impaired.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that in persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities, socio-emotional processing networks may be impaired?

Yes. Evidence from neurodevelopmental and intellectual disability research indicates that individuals in this population frequently experience challenges and impairments within socio-emotional processing networks.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim is specific, empirical, and testable regarding intellectual and developmental disabilities. Multiple retrieved papers (such as [0], [2], [7], [10], and [11]) support the notion that individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities exhibit impairments, difficulties, or selective vulnerabilities in socio-emotional processing, behavior, and emotion regulation. No papers directly refute the assertion.

Evidence for · 5
Socio-emotional regulation in children with intellectual disability and typically developing children in interactive contexts
2012
Get citation
Baurain, C. & Nader-Grosbois, N. (2012). Socio-emotional regulation in children with intellectual disability and typically developing children in interactive contexts. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2012.02.001

See more details
More for · 4
Olympic combat sports and mental health in children and adolescents with disability: a systematic review of controlled trials.
2025
Get citation
Y, L., F, G., L, C., C, P., V, B., J, H., & S, C. (2025). Olympic combat sports and mental health in children and adolescents with disability: a systematic review of controlled trials.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567978

Cognitive and neurodevelopmental outcomes in spinal muscular atrophy: a scoping review.
2026
Get citation
M, G., G, P., V, B., S, G., L, C., B, P., E, T., S, E., & MC, P. (2026). Cognitive and neurodevelopmental outcomes in spinal muscular atrophy: a scoping review.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2026.1842827

Neurocognitive and Socio-Emotional Profile of Children with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Executive Functions, Social Processing Deficits and Clinical Implications.
2026
Get citation
K, M. & KD, G. (2026). Neurocognitive and Socio-Emotional Profile of Children with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Executive Functions, Social Processing Deficits and Clinical Implications.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdn.70171

Alexithymia in neurodevelopmental populations: a scoping review of Down syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, and dual diagnosis.
2026
Get citation
N, C., I, C., W, D., HI, C., V, S., N, G., & I, D. (2026). Alexithymia in neurodevelopmental populations: a scoping review of Down syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, and dual diagnosis.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1705694

What does the evidence say?

The claim is specific, empirical, and testable regarding intellectual and developmental disabilities. Multiple retrieved papers (such as [0], [2], [7], [10], and [11]) support the notion that individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities exhibit impairments, difficulties, or selective vulnerabilities in socio-emotional processing, behavior, and emotion regulation. No papers directly refute the assertion.

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work