trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Radiation from smart speakers damages the human brain.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
1 source for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that radiation from smart speakers damages the human brain?

Partly. One mouse study reports that 2400-MHz cell-phone radiofrequency radiation altered hippocampal neurons and behavior, while a smart-meter exposure assessment found RF levels well below accepted safety standards. Neither addresses smart speakers specifically, and no item directly establishes brain damage in humans from smart speaker radiation.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 1 source for, 2 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 1
Effect of 2400 MHz mobile phone radiation exposure on the behavior and hippocampus morphology in Swiss mouse model -
Get citation
Effect of 2400 MHz mobile phone radiation exposure on the behavior and hippocampus morphology in Swiss mouse model - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.063

Evidence against · 2
Radiation
Get citation
Radiation. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation

See more details
More against · 1
Smart Meter Health and Exposure Assessment Research
Get citation
Smart Meter Health and Exposure Assessment Research. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118755471.sgd065

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work