✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The Great Leap Forward benefited China's economy and improved living standards.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 6 against
Is it true that the Great Leap Forward benefited China's economy and improved living standards?
No. Multiple reference and peer-reviewed sources state the Great Leap Forward devastated China's economy, caused a collapse in grain production and a widespread famine, and destroyed tens of millions of lives, contradicting the claim that it benefited the economy and improved living standards.
Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 6 against · Last checked
Evidence against · 6
Get citation
Great Leap Forward - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward
See more details
More against · 5
Get citation
Economy of China. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_China
Get citation
Julia, K. (1979). The Educational Experiment of the Great Leap Forward, 1958-1959: Its Inherent Contradictions.. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ220590
Get citation
Wei, L. & Tao, Y. D. (2005). The Great Leap Forward: Anatomy of a Central Planning Disaster. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ725300
Get citation
WGBH Forum Network; Frank Dikotter explains Mao's Great Famine. (2010). americanarchive.org. https://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-3x83j3940v
Get citation
WGBH Forum Network; Frank Dikotter explains Mao's Great Famine. (2010). americanarchive.org. https://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-3j3901zg1w
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work