trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The Nazis deliberately set the 1933 Reichstag fire rather than Marinus van der Lubbe acting alone.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the Nazis deliberately set the 1933 Reichstag fire rather than Marinus van der Lubbe acting alone?

Unclear. Several reference and peer-reviewed items report a historian consensus that Marinus van der Lubbe set the Reichstag fire acting alone with no Nazi involvement, which runs against the claim of a deliberate Nazi plot. However, these items describe the state of the debate rather than definitively settling the claim, and one item notes the single-culprit narrative's origins are themselves contested.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 0 sources for, 3 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 3
Get citation
Reichstag fire. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire

See more details
More against · 2
2015
Get citation
“This Story Is about Something Fundamental”: Nazi Criminals, History, Memory, and the Reichstag Fire. (2015). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008938915000345

2024
Get citation
La fabrique du complot: de l'usage de l'incendie du Reichstag par les propagandes nazie et communiste. (2024). opac.k10plus.de. https://opac.k10plus.de/

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work