trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Radial artery access for angiography has fewer complications than femoral artery access
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
confidence 77/100

Extensive clinical literature and guideline recommendations consistently support the conclusion that radial artery access for angiography and interventions has fewer vascular complications, particularly bleeding and access-site trauma, compared to femoral artery access.

Evidence for · 3
Radial artery access in interventional cardiology: a review of current practices.
2025 · cited by 1
This review notes that transradial access is the guideline-recommended default strategy due to its association with improved clinical outcomes, fewer complications, and enhanced patient comfort compared with transfemoral access.
See more details
More for · 2
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and vascular access complications: A contemporary review.
2026 · cited by 0
This contemporary review states that the transradial approach is preferred over the transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions due to lower bleeding, vascular complications, and mortality.
Initial arterial access used and associated factors in coronary procedures: A retrospective study from a tertiary indian center.
2026 · cited by 0
This retrospective study indicates that transradial access was associated with fewer complications during coronary procedures compared to transfemoral access.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7701 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt