trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Market efficiency fails in the presence of indivisible bids.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that market efficiency fails in the presence of indivisible bids?

Yes. Market efficiency can be compromised by indivisible bids and non-convexities, which introduce challenges for market clearing and long-term equilibrium.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states that market efficiency fails in the presence of indivisible bids. Papers [0], [8], and [9] directly discuss how indivisibilities, non-convexities, and discrete offers in auctions and investments create allocation inefficiencies and equilibrium failures. No papers contradict this relationship. Therefore, the verdict is SUPPORTED.

Evidence for · 3
2007
Get citation
Schvartzman, L. J. & Wellman, M. P. (2007). Market‐Based Allocation with Indivisible Bids. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00275.x

See more details
More for · 2
2024
Get citation
N, S., Y, S., & A, P. (2024). Indivisibilities in investment and the role of a capacity market.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-024-09473-6

2023
Get citation
N, S., Y, S., & A, P. (2023). Indivisibilities in Investment and the Role of a Capacity Market. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3304154/v1

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8204 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work