trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

If the deaths of N individuals are randomly distributed throughout the year, then if N is greater than or equal to 23, the probability exceeds 50% that at least two deaths will occur on the same day.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that if the deaths of N individuals are randomly distributed throughout the year, then if N is greater than or equal to 23, the probability exceeds 50% that at least two deaths will occur on the same day?

Yes. This is a direct application of the birthday problem: just as with 23 people sharing birthdays, a group of 23 or more randomly distributed deaths throughout the year has greater than a 50% chance of sharing a calendar day.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against statistical and reference sources.

Evidence for · 2
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Birthday problem. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_problem

See more details
More for · 1
Explicitly applies the birthday problem to deaths, matching the claim word-for-word.
Get citation
PLOS (all journals): The quantitative measure and statistical distribution of fame. (n.d.). PLOS (all journals). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200196

What does the evidence say?

Judged against statistical and reference sources.

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work