trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

For an ideal gas, the change in enthalpy equals the internal energy change when pressure and volume remain constant.

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that for an ideal gas, the change in enthalpy equals the internal energy change when pressure and volume remain constant?

For an ideal gas, internal energy and enthalpy depend solely on temperature; therefore, when temperature is constant (which is implied in standard thermodynamic contexts when both pressure and volume remain constant for a fixed mass), their changes are both zero and thus equal, making this a matter of fundamental thermodynamic definition.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim relies on the standard definitions of ideal gas internal energy and enthalpy, which are functions of temperature alone. When pressure and volume are both held constant, the system's temperature cannot change for a fixed amount of an ideal gas (pursuant to the ideal gas law PV = nRT), meaning the temperature change is zero, leading to zero changes in both internal energy and enthalpy. This is a basic matter of textbook thermodynamic definitions (common knowledge) rather than a contested empirical hypothesis.

What does the evidence say?

The claim relies on the standard definitions of ideal gas internal energy and enthalpy, which are functions of temperature alone. When pressure and volume are both held constant, the system's temperature cannot change for a fixed amount of an ideal gas (pursuant to the ideal gas law PV = nRT), meaning the temperature change is zero, leading to zero changes in both internal energy and enthalpy. This is a basic matter of textbook thermodynamic definitions (common knowledge) rather than a contested empirical hypothesis.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work