Fair voting procedures exist for multi-issue decision making
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
confidence 86/100
Multiple studies demonstrate that structured preference aggregation methods, combinatorial voting rules, and multi-criteria decision analysis provide viable and fair procedures for multi-issue decision making.
Evidence for · 4
Vote and Aggregation in Combinatorial Domains with Structured Preferences
2007 · cited by 66
Paper 1 discusses voting and aggregation rules specifically designed for combinatorial domains with structured preferences, indicating that multi-issue decision making can be addressed systematically.
See more details
More for · 3
How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy.
2020 · cited by 21
Paper 3 reviews Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), which provides structured procedures to support complex decision-making involving multiple perspectives and variables.
How voting rules impact legitimacy
2024 · cited by 8
Paper 6 evaluates different voting methods, including preferential and approval voting, demonstrating how various aggregation procedures function in multi-issue or multi-context decision making.
Characterizations of voting rules based on majority margins
2025 · cited by 3
Paper 8 analyzes margin-based voting rules for ranked ballots, offering mathematical frameworks and normative axioms for fair aggregation of preferences.